devalue

Like JSON.stringify, but handles

- cyclical references (obj.self = obj)
- repeated references ([value, value])
- undefined, Infinity, NaN, -0
- regular expressions
- dates
- Map and Set
- BigInt
- ArrayBuffer and Typed Arrays
- custom types via replacers, reducers and revivers

Try it out here.

Goals:

- Performance
- Security (see XSS mitigation)
- Compact output

Non-goals:

- Human-readable output
- Stringifying functions

Usage

There are two ways to use devalue:

$3

This function takes a JavaScript value and returns the JavaScript code to create an equivalent value — sort of like eval in reverse:

``js
import * as devalue from 'devalue';

let obj = { message: 'hello' };
devalue.uneval(obj); // '{message:"hello"}'

obj.self = obj;
devalue.uneval(obj); // '(function(a){a.message="hello";a.self=a;return a}({}))'
`

Use uneval when you want the most compact possible output and don't want to include any code for parsing the serialized value.

$3

These two functions are analogous to JSON.stringify and JSON.parse:

`js
import * as devalue from 'devalue';

let obj = { message: 'hello' };

let stringified = devalue.stringify(obj); // '[{"message":1},"hello"]'
devalue.parse(stringified); // { message: 'hello' }

obj.self = obj;

stringified = devalue.stringify(obj); // '[{"message":1,"self":0},"hello"]'
devalue.parse(stringified); // { message: 'hello', self: [Circular] }
`

Use stringify and parse when evaluating JavaScript isn't an option.

$3

In the case where devalued data is one part of a larger JSON string, unflatten allows you to revive just the bit you need:

`js
import * as devalue from 'devalue';

const json = {
"type": "data",
"data": ${devalue.stringify(data)}
};

const data = devalue.unflatten(JSON.parse(json).data);
`

Custom types

You can serialize and deserialize custom types by passing a second argument to stringify containing an object of types and their _reducers_, and a second argument to parse or unflatten containing an object of types and their _revivers_:

`js
class Vector {
constructor(x, y) {
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
}

magnitude() {
return Math.sqrt(this.x this.x + this.y this.y);
}
}

const stringified = devalue.stringify(new Vector(30, 40), {
Vector: (value) => value instanceof Vector && [value.x, value.y]
});

console.log(stringified); // [["Vector",1],[2,3],30,40]

const vector = devalue.parse(stringified, {
Vector: ([x, y]) => new Vector(x, y)
});

console.log(vector.magnitude()); // 50
`

If a function passed to stringify returns a truthy value, it's treated as a match.

You can also use custom types with uneval by specifying a custom replacer:

`js
devalue.uneval(vector, (value, uneval) => {
if (value instanceof Vector) {
return new Vector(${value.x},${value.y});
}
}); // new Vector(30,40)
`

Note that any variables referenced in the resulting JavaScript (like Vector in the example above) must be in scope when it runs.

Error handling

If uneval or stringify encounters a function or a non-POJO that isn't handled by a custom replacer/reducer, it will throw an error. You can find where in the input data the offending value lives by inspecting error.path:

`js
try {
const map = new Map();
map.set('key', function invalid() {});

uneval({
object: {
array: [map]
}
});
} catch (e) {
console.log(e.path); // '.object.array[0].get("key")'
}
`

XSS mitigation

Say you're server-rendering a page and want to serialize some state, which could include user input. JSON.stringify doesn't protect against XSS attacks:

`js
const state = {
userinput: ;
`

Which would result in this:

`html


`

Using uneval or stringify, we're protected against that attack:

`js
const template =
;
`

`html

`

This, along with the fact that uneval and stringify bail on functions and non-POJOs, stops attackers from executing arbitrary code. Strings generated by uneval can be safely deserialized with eval or new Function:

`js
const value = (0, eval)('(' + str + ')');
`

Other security considerations

While uneval prevents the XSS vulnerability shown above, meaning you can use it to send data from server to client, you should not send user data from client to server using the same method. Since it has to be evaluated, an attacker that successfully submitted data that bypassed uneval would have access to your system.

When using eval, ensure that you call it _indirectly_ so that the evaluated code doesn't have access to the surrounding scope:

`js
{
const sensitiveData = 'Setec Astronomy';
eval('sendToEvilServer(sensitiveData)'); // pwned :(
(0, eval)('sendToEvilServer(sensitiveData)'); // nice try, evildoer!
}
`

Using new Function(code) is akin to using indirect eval.

See also

- lave by Jed Schmidt
- arson by Ben Newman. The stringify/parse approach in devalue was inspired by arson`
- oson by Steffen Trog
- tosource by Marcello Bastéa-Forte
- serialize-javascript by Eric Ferraiuolo
- jsesc by Mathias Bynens
- superjson by Blitz
- next-json by Daniele Ricci

License

MIT