jest-given-when-then

Like rspec-given, but for Jest (port of jasmine-given)

Installation

To use this helper with Jest under Node.js, simply add it to your package.json with

`` bash
$ npm install jest-given-when-then --save-dev
`

And then from your spec (or in a spec helper), require('jest-given-when-then'). Be
sure that it's loaded after Jest itself is added to the global object.

You could also do this in the jest.config.js file like so:
`js
module.exports = {
roots: [''],
setupFilesAfterEnv: [
"/node_modules/jest-given-when-then/dist/jest-given-when-then.js"
]
}
`

Description


> jest-given-when-then works the same way in the context of Jest as the jasmine-given works in the contest of Jasmine. This is why the majority of the documentation below is a straight copy-paste from jasmine-given.

jest-given-when-then is a Jest helper that encourages leaner, meaner specs using Given, When, and Then. It is a shameless tribute to Jim Weirich's terrific rspec-given gem.

The basic idea behind the "*-given" meme is a humble acknowledgement of given-when-then as the best English language analogue we have to arrange-act-assert. With rspec and Jest, we often approximate "given-when-then" with "let-beforeEach-it" (noting that Jest lacks let).

The big idea is "why approximate given-when-then, when we could actually just use them?"

The small idea is "if we couldn't write English along with our it blocks then we'd be encouraged to write cleaner, clearer matchers to articulate our expectations."

The subtle idea is that all "given"s should be evaluated before the "when"s. This can DRY up your specs: you don't need to repeat a series of "when"s in order to test the final result with different initial "given"s.

All ideas are pretty cool. Thanks, Jim!

Example (JavaScript)

` javascript
describe("assigning stuff to this", () => {
Given(() => { this.number = 24; });
Given(() => { this.number++; });
When(() => { this.number *= 2; });
Then(() => { return this.number === 50; });
// or
Then(() => { expect(this.number).toBe(50) });
});

describe("assigning stuff to variables", () => {
var subject;
Given(() => { subject = []; });
When(() => { subject.push('foo'); });
Then(() => { return subject.length === 1; });
// or
Then(() => { expect(subject.length).toBe(1); });
});
`

As you might infer from the above, Then will trigger a spec failure when the function passed to it returns false. As shown above, traditional expectations can still be used, but using simple booleans can make for significantly easier-to-read expectations when you're asserting something as obvious as equality.




Execution order: Givens then Whens then Thens

The execution order for executing a Then is to execute all preceding Given blocks
from the outside in, and next all the preceding When blocks from the outside in, and
then the Then. This means that a later Given can affect an earlier When!
While this may seem odd at first glance, it can DRY up your specs, especially if
you are testing a series of When steps whose final outcome depends on an
initial condition. For example:

`
Given -> user
When -> login user

describe "clicking create", ->

When -> createButton.click()
Then -> expect(ajax).toHaveBeenCalled()

describe "creation succeeds", ->
When -> ajax.success()
Then -> object_is_shown()

describe "reports success message", ->
Then -> feedback_message.hasContents "created"

describe "novice gets congratulations message", ->
Given -> user.isNovice = true
Then -> feedback_message.hasContents "congratulations!"

describe "expert gets no feedback", ->
Given -> user.isExpert = true
Then -> feedback_message.isEmpty()
`
For the final three Thens, the execution order is:

`
Given -> user
When -> login user
When -> createButton.click()
When -> ajax.success()
Then -> feedback_message.hasContents "created"

Given -> user
Given -> user.isNovice = true
When -> login user
When -> createButton.click()
When -> ajax.success()
Then -> feedback_message.hasContents "congratulations!"

Given -> user
Given -> user.isExpert = true
When -> login user
When -> createButton.click()
When -> ajax.success()
Then -> feedback_message.isEmpty()
`
Without this Given/When execution order, the only straightforward way to get the above behavior would be to duplicate then Whens for each user case.

Supporting Idempotent "Then" statements

Jim mentioned to me that Then blocks ought to be idempotent (that is, since they're assertions they should not have any affect on the state of the subject being specified). As a result, one improvement he made to rspec-given 2.x was the And method, which—by following a Then—would be like invoked n Then expectations without executing each Then's depended-on Given and When blocks n times.

Take this example from jest-given-when-then's spec:

` javascript
describe("eliminating redundant test execution", () => {
describe("a traditional spec with numerous Then statements", () => {
var timesGivenWasInvoked = 0,
timesWhenWasInvoked = 0;
Given(() => { timesGivenWasInvoked++; });
When(() => { timesWhenWasInvoked++; });
Then(() => { return timesGivenWasInvoked == 1; });
Then(() => { return timesWhenWasInvoked == 2; });
Then(() => { return timesGivenWasInvoked == 3; });
Then(() => { return timesWhenWasInvoked == 4; });
});
`
Because there are four Then statements, the Given and When are each executed four times. That's because it would be unreasonable for Jest to expect each it function to be idempotent.

However, spec authors can leverage idempotence safely when writing in a given-when-then format. You opt-in with jest-given-when-then by using And blocks, as shown below:

` javascript
describe("chaining Then statements", () => {
var timesGivenWasInvoked = 0,
timesWhenWasInvoked = 0;
Given(() => { timesGivenWasInvoked++; });
When(() => { timesWhenWasInvoked++; });
Then(() => { return timesGivenWasInvoked == 1; })
And(() => { return timesWhenWasInvoked == 1; })
And(() => { return timesGivenWasInvoked == 1; })
And(() => { return timesWhenWasInvoked == 1; })
});
`

In this example, Given and When are only invoked one time each for the first Then, because jest-given-when-then rolled all of those Then & And statements up into a single it in Jest. Note that the label of the it is taken from the Then only.

Leveraging this feature is likely to have the effect of speeding up your specs, especially if your specs are otherwise slow (integration specs or DOM-heavy).




Invariants

Rspec-given also introduced the notion of "Invariants". An Invariant lets you specify a condition which should always be true within the current scope. For example:

`ts
let stack;
Given(() => { stack = new MyStack(initialContents); });
Invariant(() => { (stack.empty != null) === (stack.depth === 0) });

describe("With some initial contents", () => {
Given(() => this.initialContents = ["a", "b", "c"]);
Then(() => stack.depth === 3);

describe("Pop one", () => {
When(() => this.result = stack.pop);
Then(() => stack.depth === 2);
});

describe("Clear all", () => {
When(() => stack.clear());
Then(() => stack.depth === 0);
});
});

describe("With no contents", () => {
Then(() => stack.depth === 0);
});

…etc…
`

The Invariant will be checked before each Then block. Note that invariants do not appear as their own tests; if an invariant fails it will be reported as a failure within the Then block. Effectively, an Invariant defines an implicit And which gets prepended to each Then within the current scope. Thus the above example is a DRY version of:

`ts
Given(() => this.stack = new MyStack(this.initialContents));

describe("With some initial contents", () => {
Given(() => this.initialContents = ["a", "b", "c"]);
Then(() => this.stack.depth === 3);
And(() => (this.stack.empty != null) === false);

describe("Pop one", () => {
When(() => this.result = this.stack.pop);
Then(() => this.stack.depth === 2);
});

And(() => (this.stack.empty != null) === false);

describe("Clear all", () => {
When(() => this.stack.clear());
Then(() => this.stack.depth === 0);
And(() => (this.stack.empty != null) === true);
});
});

describe("With no contents", () => {
Then(() => this.stack.depth === 0);
And(() => (this.stack.empty != null) === true);
});

…etc…

`

except that the Invariant is tested before each Then rather than after.

"it"-style test labels

jest-given-when-then labels your underlying it blocks with the source expression itself, encouraging writing cleaner, clearer matchers -- and more DRY than saying the same thing twice, once in code and once in English. But there are times when we're using third-party libraries or matchers that just don't read cleanly as English, even when they're expressing a simple concept.

Or, perhaps you are using a collection of Then and And statements to express a single specification. So, when needed, you may use a label for your Then statements:

`ts
Then("makes AJAX POST request to create item", () => {
expect(this.ajax_spy).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
And(() => this.ajax_spy.mostRecentCall.args[0].type = 'POST');
And(() => this.ajax_spy.mostRecentCall.args[0].url === "/items");
And(() => this.ajax_spy.mostRecentCall.args[0].data.item.user_id === userID);
And(() => this.ajax_spy.mostRecentCall.args[0].data.item.name === itemName);
`

Testing Asynchronous Code

Following Jest's style for testing asynchronous code, the Given and When statements' functions can take a done parameter, which is a function to call when the asynchronous code completes. Subsequent statements won't be executed until the done completes. E.g.

`ts
Given((done) => {
$.get("/stuff").success((data) => {
this.stuff = data;
done();
})
});

When((done) => {
$.post("/do", { stuff: this.stuff }).success((data) => {
this.yay = true;
done();
});
})

Then(() => this.stuff === "the stuff");
Then(() => this.yay);
`

The Then and And statement functions can also take a done parameter, if the expectation itself requires asynchronous executation to evalute. For example if you're using Selenium, you might want to check browser state in an expectation:

`ts
Then((done) => {
browser.find('.alert', (el) => {
expect(el).toBeDefined();
done();
});
});

And((done) => {
browser.find('.cancel', (el) => {
expect(cancel).toBeDefined();
done();
});
});
``